Thursday, September 10, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· April 3, 2026

The Stock Market's "Trump Slump" Likely Isn't Over -- and There's a Big Reason Why

View original at nasdaq.com
The Stock Market's "Trump Slump" Likely Isn't Over -- and There's a Big Reason Why Key Points Although the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite soared during Donald Trump's first, non-consecutive term, they've all struggled mightily in recent weeks…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • The Fed's preferred measure of inflation (Core PCE) moved up to 3.1% in January, the highest level in 22 months. That was the 59th consecutive reading above the Fed's 2% target level. There will be no Fed rate cut next week and one could make a strong case for a rate hike.

    60% confidence
  • Regardless of whether the Iran war ends quickly or drags out, the inflationary effects will be felt for several quarters to come

    60% confidence
  • Stock Advisor's total average return is 914% - a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500

    60% confidence
  • The five previous times in which the Shiller P/E exceeded 30 during a continuous bull market were eventually followed by declines of at least 20% in one or more of Wall Street's major stock indexes

    60% confidence
  • S&P 500 Shiller PE Ratio hits 2nd highest level in history. The highest was the Dot Com Bubble

    60% confidence
  • The trailing 12-month inflation rate is projected to jump from a reported 2.4% in February to 3.16% in March

    60% confidence
  • All 107 rolling 20-year periods of S&P 500 total returns from 1900-2025 generated a positive annualized total return

    60% confidence
  • There's a glaring reason to believe that the ongoing 'Trump slump' in equities isn't over

    60% confidence
  • Approximately 20% of the world's liquid petroleum needs pass through the Strait of Hormuz daily

    60% confidence
  • The average S&P 500 bull market has lasted approximately 3.5 times longer than the typical S&P 500 bear market, dating back to the start of the Great Depression in September 1929: 1,011 calendar days vs. 286 calendar days

    60% confidence
  • Every game-changing technology since the mid-1990s has endured an early innings bubble-bursting event, and it's unlikely that AI is the exception to this unwritten rule

    60% confidence
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Capital Boom Meets Valuation Jitters: Funding Surges While Bellwether Stocks Wobble
A dense wave of AI-sector funding (Socure, Stability AI, Emerald AI, Generalist AI, Gatik, Regent Craft and others closing rounds on the same day) and strong enterprise-automation earnings (UiPath raising full-year guidance) point to continued heavy capital deployment into AI infrastructure, fintech-adjacent AI, and agentic automation. Yet Palantir's stock fell even after winning the Army's high-profile TITAN contract, and commentary (e.g., the Alphabet bull case citing AI capex and regulatory risk) signals growing investor unease about whether current AI valuations and spending levels are sustainable.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Both facts represent the same entity (JPMorgan Chase & Co.), same attribute (EPS), and same observation date (2025-12-31), which aligns with FY 2025 year-end reporting. Fact A explicitly states FY 2025 with EPS of 20.02 USD/share. Fact B has an unspecified fiscal period (N/A) but reports 4.63 USD, a significantly different value (4.3x lower). Given identical observation dates and the same metric, both facts appear intended to represent FY 2025 annual EPS. The conflicting values (20.02 vs 4.63) constitute a direct contradiction. The N/A period in Fact B suggests incomplete or corrupted metadata rather than legitimate time-period variation.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,981
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,981 facts checked against source5,278 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com
The Stock Market's "Trump Slump" Likely Isn't Over -- and There's a Big Reason Why — Source | Via News | Via News